Michael Burry’s China Bet: Is Alibaba, JD.com Worth the Risk?

Photo of author

By Tyler Matthews

Investing in Chinese markets presents unique challenges, particularly amid escalating trade disputes between the United States and China. Under President Donald Trump’s administration, significant tariffs have been implemented, prompting retaliatory measures from Beijing, including recently announced 125% tariffs on certain US goods. Despite this volatile backdrop, renowned investor Michael Burry has taken a notably contrarian position, dedicating a substantial portion of his fund’s assets to Chinese equities.

Burry’s Significant Allocation to Chinese Tech

Recent analysis of Burry’s investment portfolio reveals the extent of his commitment to the region. Chinese companies constitute a significant 43% of his investment portfolio. Leading this allocation is e-commerce giant Alibaba (BABA), accounting for 16% of the total holdings. Other major positions include online retailer JD.com and search engine leader Baidu. This strategic focus marks a divergence from concentrating solely on popular US technology firms like Nvidia, Apple, or Microsoft.

Market Headwinds and Portfolio Impact

However, this bold strategy has faced immediate headwinds. The ongoing trade conflict has negatively impacted investor sentiment towards Chinese firms listed internationally. Consequently, Burry’s key Chinese holdings have experienced sharp declines over the past month.

Recent Performance of Key Holdings

Company Recent Monthly Decline (Approx.)
Alibaba (BABA) 26.6%
JD.com 17%
Baidu 14%

This downturn has undoubtedly put pressure on the portfolio’s overall performance, reversing potential earlier gains from this specific investment approach.

A Strategic Crossroads for ‘The Big Short’ Investor

This recent market turbulence places Burry, famously known for his successful bet against the housing market depicted in ‘The Big Short’, at a critical juncture. Investors are now watching closely to see whether he will maintain his conviction in the long-term potential of these Chinese companies despite the current geopolitical and market pressures. The alternative would be a strategic pivot towards potentially safer, defensive assets within the US market. His next portfolio adjustments will be heavily scrutinized as indicators of his forward-looking assessment.

Share