Bitcoin Mining Patent Lawsuit: Core Crypto Tech Under Legal Scrutiny

Photo of author

By Tyler Matthews

A novel legal challenge is unfolding within the Bitcoin mining sector, as a patent-holding entity has initiated significant lawsuits against two prominent industry players. This litigation centers on the foundational cryptographic techniques integral to the Bitcoin protocol, raising critical questions about intellectual property ownership in the decentralized digital economy and potentially setting a far-reaching precedent for the entire cryptocurrency landscape.

The Core of the Dispute

In a move that has drawn considerable attention, Malikie Innovations, a company that acquired a substantial portfolio of 32,000 patents from BlackBerry in 2023, has filed lawsuits against major Bitcoin mining firms MARA Holdings (formerly Marathon Digital Holdings) and Core Scientific. The essence of Malikie’s claim revolves around the use of Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), a fundamental component of the Bitcoin protocol, asserting that these mining operations infringe upon its patented intellectual property.

Malikie Innovations argues that the encryption methods employed by these miners in their commercial activities, particularly during the Bitcoin mining process, fall under the protection of its patents. Court documents from Malikie reportedly state that the case pertains to “breakthrough innovations in elliptic curve cryptography… subsequently recognized and adopted by Bitcoin developers.”

Potential Implications for the Mining Industry

Should the courts rule in favor of Malikie Innovations, the financial ramifications for the defendants could be severe. The company could seek substantial compensation in the form of royalties spanning the past six years, potentially amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. This financial burden could realistically push the affected companies towards bankruptcy, as highlighted by legal experts.

Aaron Brogan, founder and managing attorney at Brogan Law, commented on the situation, explaining that “mining companies are lucrative targets that always attract lawsuits because they possess significant capital, and patent attorneys aim to capture those funds.” He emphasized that a loss could compel these firms to pay considerable sums, potentially leading to their insolvency. Furthermore, a victory for Malikie Innovations could establish a legal precedent, enabling the company to pursue similar lawsuits against other Bitcoin miners across the United States. This outcome could have profound implications for the overall security and stability of the Bitcoin network itself.

Divergent Expert Views

Despite the concerns, some legal observers offer a different perspective, suggesting that the primary objective of such lawsuits is often financial settlement rather than the dismantling of an entire industry. Michael Bachina, a crypto lawyer based in the Cayman Islands, posited that so-called “patent trolls” typically do not aim for protracted litigation but rather seek to secure compensation through out-of-court settlements.

Nico Demchuk, an attorney at AMLBot, believes that Malikie’s claims may face challenges. He noted that the prospects of the case appear uncertain if the patents are found to be expired or if their scope only covers technical aspects that predate the widespread adoption of ECC within the Bitcoin network. Even if certain patents remain active, they might pertain more to specific implementation details rather than the core cryptographic foundation of the ecosystem. Bachina further questioned whether the use of open-source code by miners could genuinely constitute a copyright infringement, even if a violation were to be technically acknowledged.

For context, MARA Holdings reported a significant crypto reserve of 49,179 BTC and achieved a record in Bitcoin production during May 2024, following the halving event.

Share